Rahul Patwari
Rahul Patwari
  • 263
  • 8 206 344
EBM Introduction
Welcome to EBM 529 - Fundamentals of Evidence Based Medicine
Переглядів: 824

Відео

Patient Safety 01
Переглядів 1699 місяців тому
Patient Safety at Rush University with Dr. David Ansell
Patient Safety 01
Переглядів 5229 місяців тому
Patient Safety 01
ECG 001 Purim
Переглядів 1009 місяців тому
ECG 001 Purim
Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Airways
Переглядів 4549 місяців тому
This video is about Nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal Airways
Laryngeal Mask Airway
Переглядів 4999 місяців тому
This video is about Laryngeal Mask Airway
Intubation Equipment
Переглядів 3819 місяців тому
This video is about Intubation Equipment
Video Laryngoscopy
Переглядів 4609 місяців тому
This video is about Video Laryngoscopy
Direct Laryngoscopy
Переглядів 1949 місяців тому
This video is about Direct Laryngoscopy
Bougie Intubation
Переглядів 3189 місяців тому
This video is about Bougie Intubation
Intraosseous Line Placement
Переглядів 1939 місяців тому
This video is about Intraosseous Line Placement
Intraosseous Line Placement
Переглядів 739 місяців тому
This video is about Intraosseous Line Placement
Ginde Vitamin D
Переглядів 2399 місяців тому
Ginde 2009 Vitamin D - Dr. Viju John
Patient Safety 2
Переглядів 249 місяців тому
This video is about Quality 2
Patient Safety 02
Переглядів 4119 місяців тому
Patient Safety #2 with Dr. David Ansell and Dr. Suparna "Nina" Dutta
RMC Practitioner: Overview of Clinical Thinking Skills
Переглядів 1399 місяців тому
RMC Practitioner: Overview of Clinical Thinking Skills
Clinical Reasoning 02a: Gather Data
Переглядів 5579 місяців тому
Clinical Reasoning 02a: Gather Data
Clinical Reasoning 02b: Data gathering example
Переглядів 3489 місяців тому
Clinical Reasoning 02b: Data gathering example
Clinical Reasoning 02c: Illness Scripts
Переглядів 4269 місяців тому
Clinical Reasoning 02c: Illness Scripts
Clinical Reasoning 03a: Making a Differential Diagnosis
Переглядів 4469 місяців тому
Clinical Reasoning 03a: Making a Differential Diagnosis
Clinical Reasoning 03b: thresholds testing
Переглядів 2479 місяців тому
Clinical Reasoning 03b: thresholds testing
Bag Valve Mask Ventilations
Переглядів 3809 місяців тому
Bag Valve Mask Ventilations
Practice EKG 02
Переглядів 2049 місяців тому
Practice EKG 02
Practice EKG 03
Переглядів 1509 місяців тому
Practice EKG 03
Practice EKG 04
Переглядів 1619 місяців тому
Practice EKG 04
Practice EKG 05
Переглядів 1319 місяців тому
Practice EKG 05
Practice EKG 06
Переглядів 1219 місяців тому
Practice EKG 06
Practice EKG 07
Переглядів 1099 місяців тому
Practice EKG 07
Practice EKG 08
Переглядів 1209 місяців тому
Practice EKG 08
Practice EKG 10
Переглядів 1209 місяців тому
Practice EKG 10

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @rdmehdi5669
    @rdmehdi5669 2 дні тому

    really amazing work, thank you very much

  • @AghaAsadulahAghaAsadulah
    @AghaAsadulahAghaAsadulah 3 дні тому

    Good sir. I was here actually to know how celiac disease causes functional hypospelenism,can you please explain that. Thanks

  • @ChazinSthl
    @ChazinSthl 4 дні тому

    Blew my mind. Thank you very much, sir.

  • @user-bh4ec7cf4w
    @user-bh4ec7cf4w 6 днів тому

    Love this little cigs 😂

  • @orangelover1142
    @orangelover1142 12 днів тому

    I love your videos!! they are nice and short with clear visuals!

  • @doctormk58
    @doctormk58 19 днів тому

    great lecture sir ....

  • @MunirAhmed-TnTVetCare
    @MunirAhmed-TnTVetCare Місяць тому

    Very easy to understand. Thanks your nice presentation. We hope more videos with good examples.

  • @usmleLION
    @usmleLION Місяць тому

    this is GREAT love all the many examples and comparisons and different views. Thank you, grateful med student

  • @annarmstrong3044
    @annarmstrong3044 Місяць тому

    Excellent. Thank you!

  • @psychopanda1882
    @psychopanda1882 Місяць тому

    Amazing explanation Thank youuu:))

  • @katielui131
    @katielui131 Місяць тому

    Think that high specificity means the test is good ruling out disease, and high sensitivity means the test is good at ruling in disease (because it's good at picking up actual disease presence cases, even if it is not very specific e.g. for a high sensitivity but low specificity test?)

  • @cousinvibedmg3621
    @cousinvibedmg3621 Місяць тому

    Why 3 new cases and not 4?

  • @thibaultl1956
    @thibaultl1956 Місяць тому

    Remarkably helpful.

  • @QabasAbdAllah-qe1nt
    @QabasAbdAllah-qe1nt Місяць тому

    That's very nice and helpful thanks ✨

  • @nesrinech3967
    @nesrinech3967 Місяць тому

    great video!

  • @asan4298
    @asan4298 Місяць тому

    Very useful. Thank you

  • @jaol5267
    @jaol5267 Місяць тому

    Hi, I have a question. I don't know how to obtain the same result multiplying probabilities and odds. Supose you have a 0.5 probability of event A and 0.5 probability of event B. As we multiply both events we get a 0.25 probability of event A|B. Now, I want to the same calculation using odds. 0.5 probability = 1:1 in odds. So, 1x1=1 that is equal to 1/(1+1) = 0.5. I cant find where is the error.

  • @ellios5734
    @ellios5734 2 місяці тому

    thank you so much but the sum of person years is 88 not 80 !!!!

  • @arihoeliab7831
    @arihoeliab7831 2 місяці тому

    Good work!

  • @marjorieedwards2546
    @marjorieedwards2546 2 місяці тому

    This was very helpful, thank you. But for this specific patient would we not want to change her metoprolol also with her history of asthma? Would we do that during this visit or wait until the infection (pneumonia) is cleared?

  • @dsavkay
    @dsavkay 2 місяці тому

    Excellent explanation, thank you!

  • @vc.artiste1
    @vc.artiste1 2 місяці тому

    Thank you, but can you be more straight to the point in your next videos

  • @shirshoshreyan7538
    @shirshoshreyan7538 2 місяці тому

    Excellent work Sir! One Question: how did we found the Standard dev of population?

  • @overflownfavored1564
    @overflownfavored1564 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for this!!!

  • @aisyaputri2640
    @aisyaputri2640 2 місяці тому

    Thank you for the explanation ☺ I love Indian channel, they can explain many things in a simple and clear way

  • @faithadesuyi9620
    @faithadesuyi9620 2 місяці тому

    🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌😀😀😀😀😀😁😁😁😁😁😂😁😂😁😂😅😅😅😅😇😇🙌🙌🙌

  • @FavorpassGoal
    @FavorpassGoal 3 місяці тому

    Prevalence. Errbody is involved at x time. Count them all including the RIPs, substract those.

  • @dr.p.s.chandranand1283
    @dr.p.s.chandranand1283 3 місяці тому

    Thanks, very nicely explained.

  • @SarahHilles
    @SarahHilles 3 місяці тому

    Thank you! It is helpful

  • @jimallen8186
    @jimallen8186 3 місяці тому

    History of violating procedure isn’t necessarily bad… it is how the American way won two world wars… note adversary challenge in that we didn’t adhere to our doctrine all that well.

  • @jimallen8186
    @jimallen8186 3 місяці тому

    “We need to train you up because you shouldn’t have made that mistake” - look again at Dekker and also at Todd Conklin and Bob Edwards, they’re all going to call this out as inappropriate blame. Gary Wong too.

    • @jimallen8186
      @jimallen8186 3 місяці тому

      In this, note also the difference in Complication and Complexity. Ordered systems, clear and complicated, are deterministic while complex are not. You can’t make rules for non-deterministic systems. You can’t analyze such. Results vary and you’ll always have unintended consequences.

    • @jimallen8186
      @jimallen8186 3 місяці тому

      With that, Cynefin, Dave Snowden, Sense-Making, “Estuaries,” John Boyd.

  • @jimallen8186
    @jimallen8186 3 місяці тому

    There’s a problem with assuming violation of clear procedure to be reckless. Sometimes procedures simply don’t fit. The simple or clear ones most of all. But too complicated are to cumbersome to know. The real point is procedures should be viewed as guidelines not rules as they can never account for context.

    • @jimallen8186
      @jimallen8186 3 місяці тому

      I’ve found a better chart getting at binning out these categories from James Reason via Pilots Who Ask Why May 15th, 2023 “Killing the Blame Game.” In this updated version, you can have deliberate rules violation leading to a systemic problem thus leaving the operator blameless. Alternately you can also get to specifically seeing the operator blameless. Were procedures violated? Yes - Were procedures Usable? Understandable? Accurate? - No, the context meant they were either not usable or not accurate. This sends you to Could a similar person have made the same answer? This should obviously be Yes but for the sake of devil’s advocate, we’ll say No. Was training insufficient? Obviously No but for the devil we’ll say yes and you get only to possibly negligent not definitely so. Should we say no as it cannot be sufficient as you can’t train to everything in complexity, you end up with system-induced error implying no blame to the operators. I’d be cautious with any such flows, but if you need one, I’d update yours to this one.

  • @SkyAssassin9
    @SkyAssassin9 3 місяці тому

    incredible...tysm

  • @prakashghosh6327
    @prakashghosh6327 3 місяці тому

    Bad video ...shame on you

  • @roselynewia8215
    @roselynewia8215 4 місяці тому

    Very well simplified, however, I though the denominator for the incidence would have been 5 and not 6 considering that the 6th person developed cancer after the 10 year period...?

  • @user-id6hg8sr7u
    @user-id6hg8sr7u 4 місяці тому

    Hello Dr. Patwari! At the latter part, where did you get the 10.9 crude mortality rate of the ref. population? Thank you!

  • @user-ir1nq8jn8g
    @user-ir1nq8jn8g 5 місяців тому

    Awesome!!

  • @user-gl9pt1tx2z
    @user-gl9pt1tx2z 5 місяців тому

    I think there is 4 new case and not 3 could you explain it?

    • @kona7289
      @kona7289 3 місяці тому

      I was thinking about it too

    • @Mans-np5wc
      @Mans-np5wc 20 днів тому

      I think so as well

  • @danaheavrin3265
    @danaheavrin3265 5 місяців тому

    This video is 10 years old but it just saved me in my graduate level epi class!

  • @fariswashigh9119
    @fariswashigh9119 5 місяців тому

    omak bus

  • @user-mj7km7dw8m
    @user-mj7km7dw8m 5 місяців тому

    Think the incidence calculation is wrong! I get 50%, (3 cases over 6 at risk)

  • @mngunicyphril1353
    @mngunicyphril1353 5 місяців тому

    This was very spot on. Thank you!! Which app did u use to do the video 🙏🏽

  • @seemantadas9369
    @seemantadas9369 6 місяців тому

    Couldn't be any simpler. Thank you!!!

  • @melaniekaveesha2482
    @melaniekaveesha2482 6 місяців тому

    Hi Dr. Rahul..I have a concern about this calculation! Could I pls know why you added the years after when they got the disease when it comes to calculate the person years? As an example in patient 1 he exposed and got disease within one year.. so he met risk from one year.. so isn't he have 1 person year?

  • @juliachambers725
    @juliachambers725 6 місяців тому

    Can you give tpa to a patient who takes plavix? Also no diabetes but prior ischemic stroke with prior tpa administration 10 years ago? Good to give? Also teeth bleeding, whites of the eyes with specs of blood when should we worry.

  • @erikfearn4472
    @erikfearn4472 6 місяців тому

    Thank You Doctor!!!! I’m going to get checked out as I am tired of being in pain!!!!!

  • @visnuc
    @visnuc 6 місяців тому

    That's a nice one. Many thanks!

  • @N-Als
    @N-Als 6 місяців тому

    I almost never comment but I had to here cause I wanted to say thank you so much for the best yet simple explaining you made studying a lot of concept so much easier ………so thank you again

  • @Moon-rq5vb
    @Moon-rq5vb 6 місяців тому

    Why do the book have a different strata? Damn I am stressed ToT.... I need to rush everything...

  • @archercrosley2865
    @archercrosley2865 6 місяців тому

    Finally. someone who can explain things with a clear, interesting voice.